Legal Opinion
Rabang v. Kelly
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 31, 2018No. CASE NO. C17-0088-JCCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' response to the Court's order to show cause (Dkt. No. 159) and Defendants' responses1 (Dkt. Nos. 161, 164). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby DISMISSES Plaintiffs' complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend for the reasons explained herein.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arises out of the disenrollment of hundreds of members of the Nooksack Indian Tribe and subsequent Department of the Interior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Jack Leeson v. Transamerica Disability IncomeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Carl Wesley Thomas v. Paul BibleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cayuga Nation v. ParkerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian ReservationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019