Legal Opinion
Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 10, 2019No. 3:17-cv-01436Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP; and Case No.: 3:17-cv-01436-GPC-MDD FRANCISCO AGUILAR, MILO 12 BARLEY, GLORIA COSTA, GEORGE ORDER: 13 DECROSE, SALLY DECORSE, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others (1) GRANTING ROSETTE 14 similarly situated, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 15 DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH Plaintiff, AND FIFTH CLAIMS; 16 v. 17 (2) GRANTING ROSETTE QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 18 YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION; STRIKE ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE & 19 ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP; [ECF No. 185] 20…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.