People v. Koebel
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtFrederick M. Marshall, J.
This motion is made on behalf of the defendant seeking suppression of alleged illegally seized evidence, as well as an alleged tainted confession made by the defendant after arrest, but prior to his arraignment.
A hearing was held before me on April 29,1962, at which time the defendant had full opportunity to present his proof. The only testimony offered was that of the three arresting police officers (discussed hereinafter), and certain records of the Buffalo Police Department which merely established the time and date of formal booking. The defendant did not testify.
The proof established…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Sferas (Two Cases). United States v. SkallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966