Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hirschorn v. Attorney-General

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*276OPINION OF THE COURT

Hilda G. Schwartz, J.

Motions 169 and 170 of January 13, 1978 are consolidated for disposition.

Petitioners move for an order quashing the subpoena served upon them by the Attorney-General of the State of New York.

The Attorney-General cross-moves for an order dismissing the petition and for a further protective order quashing the subpoena served upon the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and striking the notice to admit served upon the Attorney-General.

The subpoenas served upon petitioners by the Attorney-General were issued in connection with a pending…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. American Medical Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. State v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Dental Cooperative, Inc. v. Attorney-GeneralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Pharmaceutical Society v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Attorney-General v. KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In re KushnerNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. Roth, New York County Courts1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API