Legal Opinion

Kaldwell v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1995No. 94-271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The sole question raised by this case is whether the district court committed an abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a motion by Kalico Kaldwell (Kaldwell) to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere. The motion was made prior to the imposition of sentence pursuant to Wyo.R.CRIM.P. 32(d). Our examination of the record discloses no abuse of discretion by the trial court. We hold that the trial court properly applied the standard articulated in the rule and correctly concluded Kaldwell had failed to demonstrate any fair and just reason for the withdrawal of his plea. Even had a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthur NeedlesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. United States v. Jack Lee WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Zanetti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Nixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Burdine v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. McCard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API