Legal Opinion

Freppon v. Hittner

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 4, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

91 N.J. Super. 9 (1966)

218 A.2d 890

FRIEDA FREPPON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

REBECCA HITTNER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 14, 1966.

Decided April 4, 1966.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. Solomon Lubow argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Chazin & Chazin, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas T. Chappell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The question here is whether a domestic employee injured in the course of her work as a result of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mazzuchelli v. SilberbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Auten v. JohnstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Hake v. GreensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Seltzer v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Wenner v. McEldowney & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Taylor v. Pfaudler Sybron Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Kalnas v. Layne of New York Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API