Legal Opinion
Eva Kollsman, City National Bank, Tashi Land Corporation, a New York Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1984No. 83-5798PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Paul Kollsman sought approval from the City of Los Angeles to develop an eighty-five acre subdivision. The City denied the application on the ground that Kollsman had failed to submit requested information. Kollsman filed an action in federal district court alleging that the City’s land use regulations violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and provisions of state law. Without addressing the federal constitutional claims, the district court held that Kollsman’s subdivision application must be deemed approved under California law. We conclude that the district court,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5827 the San Remo Hotel Thomas Field Robert Field T & R Investment Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation Department of City Planning Board of Permit Appeals San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Columbia Basin Apartment Ass'n v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- His Excellency, Vincente Cuesnongle, O.P. v. Hector R. Ramos, Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Pearl Investment Company, a California Partnership v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.