Legal Opinion

State v. Vaughn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Stoddard Circuit Cowrt.

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, Judge

None of the evidence in this case is preserved in the bill of exceptions, and if the instructions were erroneous as abstract propositions of law, this court would not reverse for that reason. The propriety of instructions affecting a trial depends on the evidence, which, if not preserved, authorizes the presumption the law indulges that the judgment below is correct. (9 Mo. 165, 807; 18 Mo. 256.)

The appellant filed a motion for a certiorari On the clerk of the circuit court to require him to perfect the transcript of the record by incorporating the motions to quash and in arrest, and this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGee v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  2. Walter v. CathcartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. Hamuel v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1838
  4. Samuel v. WithersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Harvey v. NewtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. LevySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Bader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. State v. SilkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. State v. GuyottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API