Legal Opinion
United States v. Horvath
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2007No. 06-30447PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge RYMER.
*1076GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Any person who knowingly and willfully makes a materially false statement to the federal government is subject to criminal liability under 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a). Congress chose to exempt from criminal liability, however, false statements submitted to a judge by a party to a judicial proceeding. 18 U.S.C. § 1001(b). We must decide whether the exception in § 1001(b) for “statements ... submitted by [a] party ... to a judge” encompasses a false statement submitted to the judge in a presen-tence report (“PSR”), when the defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. David LeontiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Francis Johnson, United States of America v. Ricardo Bernard SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. GianelliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rodriguez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.