Sgromolo v. City of Asbury Park
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtPeuskie, J.
This cause is before me on the return of a rule to show cause, which T allowed (R. S. 2:83-4), why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not be granted compelling respondents to issue a permit to the relator for the construction of a building, to be used as a restaurant, at the southeast corner of Third Avenue and Kingsley Street, in the City of Asbury Park.
From the unchallenged proofs as to the layout of the streets and as to the existing uses made of the properties abutting those streets, in relation to the relator’s property, we ascertain the following facts:
Kingsley Street is one block…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conaway v. City of Atlantic City & Pacific Garage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Losick v. BindaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Lutz v. KaltenbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Munns v. StenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Richmond Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Dade County v. JasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- City of Miami v. McCrory Stores CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.