Legal Opinion
Bijur Lubricating Corp. v. Devco Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 26, 2004No. Civ. 00-5157 (WHW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Defendants Devco Corp. (“Devco”) and William E. Durnan, Jr., bring this Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is granted.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Bijur Lubricating Corp. (“Bijur”) filed its Complaint in October 2000, alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution, and unjust enrichment against Defendants. 1 Bijur designs, manufactures, and sells lubricating systems and replacement parts for those systems. Devco competes with Bijur in the sale of lubricating parts, components, and services, and was founded in the 1980s by Durnan, a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mueller Co. v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
- JUUL LABS, INC. v. 4X PODSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- PENN ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING CORP. v. PENINSULA COMPONENTS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022