Legal Opinion

Head v. Robinson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1985No. 84-809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Head asserts that the trial court erred in dismissing her motion for pendente lite child support for want of jurisdiction. We agree and reverse.

Head and Robinson are the mother and father respectively of a child born out of wedlock on September 9, 1978, in the District of Columbia. From birth until on or about January 15-, 1982, the child was in Head’s custody; Robinson forcibly removed the child from her custody on or about that date. On February 7, 1983, Head filed a Petition for habeas corpus seeking return to her of the child. The *1290petition named as respondents…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Story v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Andrade v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Pugh v. PughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Bazemore v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API