Legal Opinion

Spitz v. Nunn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1930No. 10498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

One of the early cases decided by our Supreme Court bearing upon the point in controversy, is the case of Sutliffe vs. Atwood, 15 OS. 194, which is followed in Lodge vs. White, 30 OS. 575. In Lodge vs White, syllabus (1) is as follows:

“A lessee remains liable on his express agreement to pay rent, notwithstanding he may have assigned his lease with the lessor’s consent and the lessor has accepted rent from the lessee.”

The latest pronouncement was in Blosser vs Enderlin, 113, OS. 134, wherein the court reiterated the law'to the effect that a lessee is liable for an express agreement to pay rent…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Steel Supply Co. v. ChrismanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Steiner v. MinkowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. 801 South Fulton Avenue Corp. v. RadinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Yearling Properties, Inc. v. TedderOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Childs v. Warner Bros. Southern Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API