Legal Opinion

Retterath v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 27, 2014No. 4:14-cv-00158-JEG-RAWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY ALL DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

ROSS WALTERS, United States Magistrate Judge.

The above resisted motion [119] is before the Court. It is decided' on the motion papers. LR 7.c.

*877The dispute in this case centers on the validity and enforceability of a Membership Unit Repurchase Agreement (“MURA”) allegedly entered into between defendant Homeland Energy Solutions (“HES”) and Mr. Retterath under which HES agreed to repurchase Mr. Retterath’s membership units. (Second Amend. Complaint Ex. 6[847]). Mr. Retterath alleges HES’s chairman,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. In Re LaBranche Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API