Fensler v. Sterling, Admr.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The only question requiring the consideration of this court is whether the Court of Appeals committed error in reversing the judgment of the trial court upon the single ground that there is no evidence in the record tending to show the time of any of the alleged alterations of the note. Restated and simplified the question is whether there is any evidence of any alteration made without Mrs. Bailey’s assent and subsequent to the execution and delivery of the note.
The parties are agreed that the signature on the questioned document is Mrs. Bailey’s, and also that there is evidence of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Luna v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nordale v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Hundley v. NeelyWyoming Supreme Court · 1961