Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Murphy
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.:
The questions arising upon this accounting are disposed of as follows:
The compensation of the executor, Joseph H. Fargis, as attorney, is fixed as set forth in the account,
The personal claim of Joseph F. Murphy, executor, is approved and allowed under the provisions of section 212 of the Surrogate’s Court Act at $2,481.04.(1) A question has arisen as to the manner in which the transfer tax assessed against the brother of the decedent is charged. By paragraph 4 of the will the testator gave all the rest, residue and remainder of his estate to his trustees, and directed that out of *673the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- In Re the Accounting of TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- In re KohlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- In re the Estate of FleischerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re ErbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Besoyan v. SetrakianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of PurdyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- In re the Estate of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925