Commonwealth Ex Rel. Weible v. Weible
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
In this appeal relatrix complains that the order of $25 per month, entered against the respondent for her support, is unreasonably inadequate.
The wife is 48 years of age; the respondent is 62. She has a family of five grown children by a former marriage. The amount of the order is less than one-third of defendant’s gross earnings of $34 per week, and he has additional income from savings invested in government bonds. But under all of the circumstances we are unable to say that there is an abuse of discretion (Schoenfeldt v. Schoenfeldt, 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 455, 27 A. 2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pa. Ex Rel. Suess v. SuessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schoenfeldt v. SchoenfeldtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Gutzeit v. GutzeitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. GleasonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth ex rel. Litz v. LitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Trichon v. TrichonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. BickingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.