Legal Opinion

Ludlam v. Mistick Construction Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 21, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01757Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KARYN FAY LUDLAM ) CASE NO. 1:24-cv-1757 ) Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER v. ) ) MISTICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ) OPINION & ORDER et al., ) ) Defendants. On December 2, 2024, Defendant Ron Porvasnik filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), arguing that Plaintiff Karyn Fay Ludlam had failed to state a valid claim against him. ECF Doc. 6. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. 9) arguing that Defendant incorrectly stated the controlling state law.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bridgett Handy-Clay v. City of Memphis, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. John Keith Blakely and John Emmett Long v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API