State v. . Rochelle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from 0. U. Allen, J., at July Special Term, 1911, of Durham.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Tbe defendant was convicted of tbe illegal sale of intoxicating liquor. Tbe first exception is because tbe court declined to allow bim to put in evidence a subpoena duces tecum issued by tbe State for Wheeler Martin, Collector of Internal Eevenue, tó bring witb bim a list of all persons in said county wbo bad obtained United States license to sell liquor. It is true tbat wben a man takes out United States license to sell liquor, under our statute a presumption arises tbat be is engaged in tbat business. But tbe fact tbat he has no such license from tbe United States Government does not raise…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. . SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Pueblo v. Moreu PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.