Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Berry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Malley, J.

Herewith is involved the construction of section 221-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by chapter 210 of the Laws of 1929. Its provisions, in so far as material to the question presented, are:

“ § 221-b. Taking of examination, depositions and statements by official stenographer. * * *
“ Where the defendant is charged with a felony and is held to answer, a copy of such stenographic minutes, notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, shall be furnished by such official stenographer to the district attorney of the county. Upon request of the district attorney, such minutes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woollcott v. . ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Haswell v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Matter of KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. People v. NeffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crane v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Thompson v. HofstatterNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Parsons v. Department of TransportationNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sorensen v. City of New York and Four Other CasesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. Kanovitz v. BloodgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API