Legal Opinion
People v. Manganaro
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Steven W. Fisher, J.
The primary question on this motion to suppress is whether the police may conduct a purposeful visual search of the interior of an occupied automobile without cause. The issue involves the plain view exception to the Fourth Amendment’s *617warrant requirement and whether New York law has been affected by the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Horton v California (496 US —, 110 S Ct 2301, 110 L Ed 2d 112) which eliminated the element of inadvertence from the Federal law of plain view.
The facts here are largely undisputed.
On the afternoon of December 13,1989,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ManganaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991