State v. Scholz
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
In his appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault 1 entered after a jury verdict in Superior Court (Kennebec County), the Defendant, Stephen J. Scholz, focuses upon the unavailable witness exception to the hearsay rule, M.R.Evid. 804(b)(1). 2
Because we find that the State failed to lay the proper foundation for admitting into evidence the prior recorded testimony of two witnesses represented to be unavailable at trial, we conclude that the trial justice 3 erred in admitting their testimony over the objection of the Defendant, and therefore, we sustain his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. FredetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- State v. HassapelisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ChildsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.