Kilroy v. Husted
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
Before this Court are Defendant Jon Husted’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 74), Plaintiff John P. Kilroy’s Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 83), and Husted’s Reply Brief in Support of his Motion (ECF No. 90). Defendant Husted, the Ohio Secretary of State, moves for summary judgment solely on the ground that the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars Plaintiff Kilroy’s lawsuit. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
Plaintiff Kilroy is an Ohio citizen who has been actively…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.