Carle v. Heller
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
One Charles Heller died intestate, leaving surviving him a daughter, the plaintiff herein, and a widow and two sons, the defendants. The widow was appointed administratrix of his estate and the same, as inventoried, was in due course settled and distributed in accordance with the orders of court. Thereafter plaintiff filed this complaint, alleging that her mother, as such administratrix, had neglected and failed to account for certain property owned by deceased at the time of his death. This property, all of which defendant Louise Heller claims as her separate estate, consisted of $1-2,000…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Denigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Alferitz v. ArrivillagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Randall v. Department of InstitutionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Dyment v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Alexander v. BosworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.