Legal Opinion
Durgin v. Pillsbury Lake Water District
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 1, 2006No. 2005-328PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The plaintiff, Gladys Lee Durgin, appeals an order of the Franklin District Court (Boynton, J.) dismissing her implied contract claim against the defendant, Pillsbury Lake Water District. We affirm.
In July 2004, Durgin filed a breach of contract claim against the Water District claiming that it entered into an agreement with her to provide sufficient water to her residence. She sought damages, including reimbursement for the costs associated with the installment of an artesian well on her property. The trial court bifurcated the proceeding and conducted a bench trial, first hearing evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Short v. School Administrative Unit No. 16Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Morgenroth & Associates, Inc. v. Town of TiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Renovest Co. v. Hodges Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Harrison v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tessier v. RockefellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Rok Builders, LLC v. 2010-1 SFG Venture LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Poland v. TwomeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Walsh v. Zurich American Insurance CompCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Ameriswiss Technology, LLC v. Midway Line of Illinois, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.