Legal Opinion

Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge McGeehan speaking for the majority in the Appellate Division of the Superior Court, 11 N. J. Super. 46, except that the defendant, Nathan Peekerman, is relieved of the payment of the plaintiffs costs on his appeal as provided in said opinion.

For affirmance and modification—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.

For reversal—None.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coolidge & Sickler, Inc. v. RegnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Piscitelli v. Penna.-Reading SS LinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. King v. PatrylowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Guzzi v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Flynn v. StearnsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Milacci v. Mato Realty Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  5. Advance Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API