Meister v. Woolverton
New York Supreme Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court and a jury.
1Per curiam
Upon the main question between the parties, the construction of section 38 of the Public Service Commissions Law, we concur in the reasoning of the Appellate Division of the Second Department in Morgan v. Woolverton, 136 App. Div. 351, and shall hereafter follow it in preference to Richardson v. Woolverton, 117 N. Y. Supp. 908, where the point as to the meaning of the word “ hag*168gage” was not brought before the court. The testimony of the expert dressmaker as to the value of the dresses lost was not based on sufficiently definite information to malee it valuable, hut its admission was not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morgan v. WoolvertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Richardson v. WoolvertonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hiddink v. WoolvertonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910