Legal Opinion

Hiddink v. Woolverton

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1910Published

Motion to set aside - verdict directed, subject to the opinion of the court, under section 1185 of the Code.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This is an action for damages brought against the defendant for the loss of a trunk, the check for which was given to defendant’s agent aboard a railroad train in Jersey City, for delivery to a hotel in the city of Hew York. The plaintiff sued to recover the full value of the trunk, and upon the trial a verdict was directed subject to the opinion of the court, under section 1185 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for $1,080. The court permitted the jury to fix the value of the property and then directed the verdict. The defendant concedes the delivery of the trunk for transportation and its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. WoolvertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Baum v. Long Island RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1908
  3. Richardson v. WoolvertonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  4. Bigelow v. WoolvertonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  5. Meister v. WoolvertonNew York Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API