Legal Opinion
In Re Connectix Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided May 10, 2007No. 19-40237PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON OBJECTION TO CLAIM
MARILYN MORGAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Introduction
Carol Wu, the Chapter 7 Trustee, has objected to a claim in the amount of $2,335,283.99 that EOP-Peninsula Office Park, the debtor’s former landlord, filed against the estate of Connectix Corporation. The Trustee asserts that the correct application of § 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code limits EOP’s recovery to $446,246.99. The debtor and its three major shareholders join in the Trustee’s objection. After hearing arguments of counsel and reviewing the parties’ submissions, the court sustains the Trustee’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, A.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- ADMANCO, Inc. ex rel. Polsky v. 700 Stanton Drive, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Kupfer v. Salma (In re Kupfer)District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Admanco, Inc. v. 700 Stanton Drive, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- ADMANCO, INC. EX REL. POLSKY v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- ADMANCO, Inc. ex rel. Polsky v. 700 Stanton Drive, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.