Legal Opinion

Trico Products Corp. v. Roberk Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 31, 1973No. Civ. No. B-323PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BLUMENFELD, Chief Judge.

Trico Products Corporation, assignee of Emory W. Lenz and Anthony C. Scinta, instituted this action against the Roberk Company charging it with infringement of U.S. Patent No. 3,153,254 (hereinafter Lenz patent) issued to it on October 20, 1964, for an alleged invention entitled “Windshield Wiper.”

The defendant denied infringement and counterclaimed for a declaration that the Lenz patent is invalid on two grounds: (1) that it is not non-obvious in view of the prior art; and (2) that its claims are overly broad. The court has…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API