Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Harris

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1963No. 3112PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The complaint here contains two claims, the first a cause of action for interpretation of an ambiguous clause in a contract for the sale of appellant’s partnership interest in an insurance agency, it being asserted that in computing the sum due plaintiff under the sales contract the amounts owed by him for premiums on personal insurance written by the agency had been improperly deducted from the agency’s accounts receivable; the second a cause alleging a credit due plaintiff by reason of an accountant’s error at the time plaintiff purchased his interest in the business.

Defendant filed motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vale v. BonnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. United States Camo Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1956

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Knudson v. HilzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Martin & Luther General Contractors, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Wheatland Irrigation District v. Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API