Legal Opinion

Broten v. Broten

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2017No. 20160151PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kapsner, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Broten, individually, and as personal representative of the estate of Olaf Broten, appeals from a second amended judgment denying him restitution for payments he made to his parents during their lifetimes. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

[¶ 2] The relevant facts in this case are summarized in Broten v. Broten, 2015 ND 127, 863 N.W.2d 902, and we will not repeat them here except as necessary to resolve the issue raised in this appeal.

[¶ 3] In 1979, Broten and his parents Helen and Olaf Broten executed a contract for deed to purchase approximately…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Estate of ZentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Werven v. WervenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Broten v. BrotenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Nelson v. MattsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Estate of FinstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. McDougall v. AgCountry Farm Credit ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Broten v. BrotenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API