Legal Opinion

On-Line Services Ltd. v. Bradley & Riley PC (In Re Internet Navigator, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2003No. BAP 03-6023NIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the bankruptcy court 1 dated April 22, 2003, which held that a claim for attorney’s fees filed by Bradley and Riley (“B & R”), incurred defending state court litigation between the former shareholders of the Debtor, Internet Navigator, Inc. (“INI”), were payable under the Debtor’s confirmed reorganization plan. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

“Findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  3. In Re Grand Jury Appearance of Alvin S. Michaelson, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Haupt v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Norton D. Waltuch v. Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Continental Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dove-Nation v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Dove-Nation)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. In re: Luis Damian Corraliza MartinezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2025
  3. Moore v. SanchezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
  4. Phyllis Dove-Nation v. eCAST SettlementUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API