Legal Opinion

Lowden v. Seminole County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1939No. 29089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This cause is presented on appeal from a decision of the Court of Tax Review, sustaining a levy to meet an appropriation for the salaries of “health officer, supervising nurse, and clerk to the health officer” contained in the budget of Seminole county as prepared and approved by the excise board of that county.

The protested appropriation, consisting of the three items above mentioned, aggregated $6,800, of which all in excess of $1,500 is said by the protestants to be illegal. The levy to meet the asserted illegal portion of the appropriation is .2125' mill.

The contested levy is admittedly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of Picher v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Going v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Greer County Excise Board v. LowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FERGASON VS. LV METRO POLICE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  2. FERGASON VS. LV METRO POLICE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API