Legal Opinion

Randazzo v. Barnhart

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 26, 2004No. 2:03-cv-02844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

Felicita Randazzo (“Randazzo” or the “plaintiff’) proceeding pro se commenced this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final determination of Jo Anne B. Barnhart, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her widow’s insurance benefits. Presently before the Court is a motion by the Commissioner for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”) 12(c).

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History

On August 7, 1991, Randazzo filed an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Staib v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  2. Barnes v. American International Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Barnes v. AMERICAN INTERN. LIFE ASSUR. CO.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Gibbons v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  5. Valentine v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API