Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Markowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Hampton, which granted the respondent Irving Liebman’s application for a variance to relocate and alter an accessory structure, the petitioners appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered November 21, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding and (2), so much of an order of the same court, entered February 8, 1989, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Barrett v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Buitenkant v. RobohmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Perger v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Committee to Preserve Brighton Beach & Manhattan Beach, Inc. v. Council of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Barreca v. DeSantisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Paloma Homes, Inc. v. PetroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Frank v. Zoning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Kam Hampton I Realty Corp. v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API