State v. Keller-Deen

¶1 Lanette Keller-Deen appeals her conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine, contending the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. She argues the sheriff’s detectives did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to conduct an investigative Terry1 stop based on her purchase of two items associated with methamphetamine manufacture and her *398earlier purchases of four other items that could be used in the same process. We affirm.

Brown, J. —

*398FACTS

¶2 In December 2004, a Home Depot loss prevention officer contacted Detective Doug Stanley to advise him that a “suspicious…