Legal Opinion

CONSOLIDATED FINANCE CORPORATION v. Thorp

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 17, 1969No. 23285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore. *

The plaintiff in error will be referred to as Consolidated. Defendants in error M. E. and Emma Thorp were intervenors in the trial court and will be referred to as the Thorps. Marcus Gallegos was also an intervenor in the trial court and will be mentioned by name. The defendants named in the complaint filed by Consolidated were William H. Ayers and Romula T. Ayers doing business as O. K. Auction Company. They are not parties to the action in this court since William did not appear in the trial court and Romula was dismissed as a defendant. Hartford Fire Insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Cavos v. GeihslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  3. Trinidad National Bank v. Jamieson House Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Alaska Sales and Service, Inc. v. MilletAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ulander v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. GORE TRADING COMPANY v. AliceColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API