Legal Opinion
Bowery Savings Bank v. 566 Amsterdam Avenue Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.
In this mortgage foreclosure action, the receiver moves to settle his account, for a fixation of his commissions and an extra allowance, and for a direction requiring the plaintiff to pay a deficit in his account, in addition to commissions and allowances, or, in the alternative, that they be made a first charge upon the surplus money in the hands of the Referee. The Referee’s report of sale shows a surplus resulted from the sale in the amount of $6,100.54.
*460The receiver was confronted with monumental problems in the management of a slum property incumbered by numerous and serious violations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. KoralekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Handman v. MadonickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Mackenzie v. Marine Midland Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Acme Mutual Corp. v. Loujay Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Litho Fund Equities, Inc. v. Alley Spring Apartments Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Independent Properties Co. v. Mast Property Investors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Amusement Distributors, Inc. v. Oz Forum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- New York Bank for Savings v. Jamaica Towers West AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. Abbott Manor Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.