Legal Opinion
John C. Lautermilch v. Findlay City Schools
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2003No. 01-3502PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J., joined by Mckinley, D.J.,
MOORE, J., (pp. 276-78), delivered a separate dissenting in part.
OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff John C. Lautermilch appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant Findlay City Schools (“the Schools”). For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM.
I
In 1996, Lautermilch began working as a substitute teacher for the Schools. Like other substitute teachers, Lautermilch did not sign a contract for employment with the Schools.
In 1998, Principal Kathleen Crates and Assistant Principal Michael Kuri decided that Lautermilch would not be called again as a substitute teacher. They…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gutzwiller v. FenikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Henkel v. Educational Research Council of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Smith v. City of Salem, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- William Singfield v. Akron Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Robert Deleon v. Kalamazoo County Road Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Joshua Nye and Judy Ramirez v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- L. W. v. Jonathan SkrmettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.