Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Beach
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1888No. 12,886PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant brought this suit to have a deed, absolute on its face, declared a mortgage, and to have it declared invalid as a mortgage, because executed by her to secure the debt of her husband.
The appellees filed a cross-complaint containing these.material allegations: That Mary J. Rogers is and has been the wife of Newton J. Rogers for more than ten years; that Newton J. Rogers was the treasurer of Vigo county from 1877 to 1881, inclusive ; that he was a defaulter in the sum of $50,000; that the appellees were the sureties on his official bond ; that, while he was indebted to the county,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conway's Executors & Devisees v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Dumont v. DuforeIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Glover v. PaynNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Hays v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolfe v. McMillanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Davis v. LennenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Cook v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Miller v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Powers v. NesbitIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.