Legal Opinion

Hodgman v. State Line & Sullivan Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Aurora, Illinois; the Hon. E. P. Goodwin, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cabtweig-ht

Appellee brought this suit against appellant to recover the contract price of coal sold and delivered to appellant. The general issue was pleaded, and it was stipulated that all defenses should be admissible under that plea. The defense made on the trial was that the coal was- warranted to be of a certain kind, and. to have certain qualities as a fuel; that it was not of the kind and did not possess the qualities warranted, and that appellant suffered damage on account of the breach of the warranty. There was a verdict for appellee for $535.14, from which appellee remitted $55.21, which is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phelan v. AndrewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Glidden v. PoolerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Cohn v. Bessemer Gas Engine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Heenan v. RedmenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  4. Tibbals Oakum Co. v. MeigsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API