Legal Opinion

Heenan v. Redmen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, on a breach of warranty of personal property. Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle County; the Hon. Charles Blanchabd, Judee, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1001.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action brought against Daniel Heenan by Samuel B. Kedmen and Frank King to recover for a breach of warranty of sheep alleged to have been sold by Heenan to said plaintiffs and Burton O. Mackey, who died before the suit was brought. The declaration contained several counts, charging that said three parties bought 131 sheep from defendant for a certain price, which the purchasers paid, and that defendant warranted that said sheep were sound and healthy, and free from disease of every kind and nature, whereas said sheep…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. ClappNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Crabtree v. KileIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Phelan v. AndrewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hodgman v. State Line & Sullivan RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sapp v. BradfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Glover v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API