Legal Opinion
In re Anonymous No. 65 D.B. 82
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 31, 1984No. Disciplinary Board Docket No. 65 D.B. 82Published
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:
KECK, Member,
Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.
I. HISTORY OF THE CASE
On or about April 1, 1981, respondent opened an office for the practice of law under the designation “[A] Legal Clinic” using a distinctive logotype.
The matter came to the attention of Disciplinary Counsel who charged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Geo. Washington Mint, Inc. v. Washington Mint, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Neshaminy Construction Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.