Osborne v. Vince
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
The issue is whether the chancery court erred in permitting complainants to amend their bill of complaint fifteen years after it had been filed and there had been no intervening prosecution by them of their suit. We think this was manifest error, and hold that defendant’s motion to dismiss for want of prosecution should have been sustained.
On May 2, 1945, appellee Ollie Vince filed a bill of complaint in the Chancery Court of Walthall County against Ed W. Dawson, address unknown, and W. B. Osborne, San Antonio, Texas. The bill was wholly insufficient to charge a cause of action. Prom the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neal v. TeatMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Mississippi Cent. R. Co. v. Brookhaven Lumber & Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Tishomingo Saving Institution v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Par Industries, Inc. v. Target Container Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Natural Mother v. Paternal AuntMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- William Iselin & Co., Inc. v. Delta AuctionMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Jones v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
- Liberty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MitchellMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.