Legal Opinion

Neal v. Teat

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1961No. 41619PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClLLESPIE, J.

The question in this case is whether the defendant in a suit in equity by a landowner to cancel a deed to one- half undivided interest in minerals on grounds of fraud may invoke the ten-year statutes of limitations, Sections 709 and 710, Mississippi Code of 1942, when the landowner’s mineral deed has been of record for more than ten years before the suit was filed.

The original bill in chancery was filed by Oscar Neal and his wife, Hattie Neal, who alleged that they were the owners of 160 acres of land which was their homestead, and that on March 11, 1940, the agents of defendant A. H. Teat…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harris v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Dingey v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Russell Inv. Corp. v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Aultman v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hunt v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. MilletteMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McMahon v. McMahonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. St. Regis Pulp & Paper Corp. v. FloydMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Payne v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Mills v. Damson Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API