Legal Opinion

Elmer E. Haury and Hazel Kelly v. Allstate Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1967No. 9379_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action the issue is whether proceedings in New Mexico on an insurance policy are barred by a California statute of limitations. The district court held that they were barred and granted summary judgment for the appellee-defendant Allstate Insurance Company.

The insuror, an Illinois corporation, issued an automobile policy to appellant Haury, a California resident. The policy was written, and the premiums paid, in California. The policy contained an uninsured-motorists provision whereby the insured was entitled to receive from the insuror all sums…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Headrick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. Slade v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Eichel v. Goode, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. Chester A. Anderson, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API