Legal Opinion

Hildebrand v. Holyoke Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 24, 1978PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

The plaintiff 1 commenced this action seeking to recover damages 2 resulting from a fire which destroyed her dwelling house and its contents, both of which had been insured against fire loss by the defendant. The defendant counterclaimed alleging it was entitled to recover $15,872.72 from the plaintiff. 3

The sole issue raised by plaintiff’s appeal is whether the presiding Justice, when ordering judgment for the defendant, erred in ruling that it would be “against public policy and violative of the provisions of the insurance contract” to allow recovery by the plaintiff even…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. LebrechtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  4. Erlin-Lawler Enterprises, Inc. v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Kipp v. HurdleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. American Economy Insurance v. LiggettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Wayne v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API