Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1998No. S-97-1042PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

In this appeal, the State of Nebraska contends that the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in finding the Second Injury Fund (the Fund) responsible for a portion of workers’ compensation benefits awarded to Marline Crouch as a result of injuries she sustained while employed by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Crouch began working for Goodyear in 1988. On April 3, 1996, Crouch filed a petition seeking to recover workers’ com pensation benefits for injuries resulting from three work-related accidents: (1) in September 1990, a ruptured…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Starks v. Cornhusker Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sherard v. Bethphage Mission, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Green v. Drivers Management, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Frank v. a & L INSULATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Miller v. Meister & SegristNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hoffart v. FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API