Legal Opinion

David Loveall v. Lane County; Steve Mokrohisky, in his personal and official capacity as Lane County Administrator; Heather Buch, in her personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner; Laurie Trieger, in her personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner; and Pat Farr, in his personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 19, 2026No. 6:26-cv-00534Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DAVID LOVEALL, a Lane County Case No. 6:26-cv-00534-MC Commissioner, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY, a local government entity; STEVE MOKROHISKY, in his personal and official capacity as Lane County Administrator; HEATHER BUCH, in her personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner; LAURIE TRIEGER, in her personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner; and PAT FARR, in his personal and official capacity as a Lane County Commissioner, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API